Phthalate Research: News & Peer-Reviewed Scientific Studies

This is one of a series of articles. The following are others in the series. If the link is not active, it means that the article is in progress but not finished.

NOTE: This page is a stub and currently under construction. Please pay us another visit soon.

The following will be a growing set of recent, credible and trustworthy studies — published, peer-reviewed science conducted by experts who have no conflicts of interest and no stake in slanting science one way or another.

Some biased studies slip through the peer review process. We will point those out. These papers usually come from the chemical industry, former tobacco consultants or labs indebted to corporations. All of them attempt to distort or ignore good science in order to put positive spins on health hazards of various products.

We will also include select news articles curated for accuracy, context and completeness. When possible, we will pair them with peer-reviewed studies.

This ad-free article is made possible by the financial support of the
Center for Research on Environmental Chemicals in Humans: a 501(c)(3) non-profit.
Please consider making a tax-deductible donation for continued biomedical research.

Tips On How To Tell What And Who Can Be Trusted

The following may shed some light on the trust and credibility issue: How To Separate Good Science From Sketchy Tales).

This link (Toxic Science: Fiddling Facts For Profit & Legal Leverage) will illustrate how a major chemical company, the American Chemical Council and the main plastics industry association conspired with former tobacco officials and private labs to concoct a slanted and flawed study then conceal the invalid conclusions and conflicts of interest so they could use the results in a federal court case.

Recent Published, Peer-Reviewed Scientific Papers [& News About Them]

(Read why peer-reviewed information is the most trustworthy: How To Separate Good Science From Sketchy Tales)

Comments are closed.