By Lewis Perdue and Rebecca L. Yeamans (Corresponding author: lperdue@ideaworx.com) NOTE: An earlier version of this paper originally appeared on nano-active.com on Feb., 24, 2014. This version is enormously expanded to address peer-review suggestions from multiple prominent researchers. Those who helped improve this paper who wish to remain un-named because the direct and un-nuanced data […]
Archive | June, 2014
Bad Science Thrives When Corporations & Government Regulators Deny Peer Review
Part 2 of a 4-Part Series View Part 1 here: How To Separate Good Science From Sketchy Tales View Part 3 here: The Corporate Fact-Fiddling Industry One massive, gaping hole in American scientific peer review — especially for public safety purposes — can be found in the near-total absence of proper peer review in the […]
Peer Review, Reproducibility: How To Separate Good Science From Sketchy Tales
Part 1 of a 3-Part Series View Part 2 here: Bad Science Thrives When Corporations & Government Regulators Deny Peer Review View Part 3 here: Private Science For Hire: Poster Children For Un-trustworthy Science To a non-scientist, a study is a study is a study. All seem equally complex, dense, and resistant to understanding for […]
Why Is “Estrogenic Action” Important?
The term “estrogenic” refers to hormone disrupting chemicals like BPA and other chemicals from plastics, pesticides and other sources that can affect the health of both men and women in ways that are similar to estrogen. Most hormone disruptors exhibit estrogenic action. The Endocrine Society (www.endo-society.org) — the world’s oldest and largest organization for doctors […]